One day I found a Viking Severn Valley frame. I was probably about 14. I stripped it down to bare metal and my Dad and I (mainly my Dad) did a rather good rattle can respray and I built it up with scavenged bits. I kept the bike until my university days in Manchester where it got stolen 7 or 8 years later. I've always wanted another.
So I need a bike for the Eroica. I saw a Viking frame, my size on ebay. It wasn't clear what model it was, but it had the right looking lugs and seemed in reasonable condition, although largely repainted by a previous owner. It still had the head badge and a seat tube sticker. I stuck in a bid. In the same week another bike came up on ebay, a Viking Hosteller apparently. Again it had been repainted by the previous owner. It was listed as 19", a bit small for me, but had some original components. I stuck a bid in for that as well, thinking I'd swap the bits over and sell the frame on.
Well I won both and for £100 had a frame plus a complete bike. When I got the Hosteller home, it turned out to be a 21 1/2" frame not 19", my size. So now I had a dilemma, which do I build up? And what had I actually bought?
The frame no of the Hosteller puts it as about 1960. The other frame I think is an Ian Steel from 1960 as well. But what its actually made from is still a mystery. Viking at the time seem to have had a catalogue only as a starting point and pretty much built semi-custom to the individual or the bike shop's spec.
First the "Ian Steel". These were a slightly lower end bike introduced after Ian Steel won the inaugural Tour of Britain. I the late 50's they had frame no's starting with a "S". Mine is S8967. Not sure what tubing, early ones were Reynolds butted 531, probably just reused Severn Valley's or Tour of Britain's, but then later ones were still 531 but not butted. Its definitely post 1959 as it has the "1st Tour of Britain, 51, 55, 58,59" seat tube badge.